Poptropica Counterfeit Dragon Papers

After several months of discussion, the various sectors of the Broad Front to agree and agreed the final text of the controversial Education Act.

Under the new law, the government intends to form an integrated educational system, as understood currently it is very fragmented.

The committee that created the Frente Amplio Congress late last year to analyze the law, managed to settle the most controversial of the reform: the integration of the codex and decentralized councils.

The New Space deputy and member of the Committee on Education, Diego Canepa, said this morning at index 810 that the Frente Amplio reached "political agreement" in which the term first executive position and most sectors of the left coalition.

This forced the MPP and the Party Communist to budge on his claim that the bodies had total autonomy of political power.

The deputy noted that these sectors, "although they think the same, they prioritized the political agreement", while the government gave in to make no changes as deep "as I wanted at first. Canepa

said Monday the project will be considered by the Board Policy and in the coming days will begin to be discussed in Parliament.

explained that he decided to keep the majority for the Executive to ensure the sustainability of plans and the consistency with draft the country with the government.

"We must be very clear that they have had a balance, with a majority of the Executive Branch of turn, which represents the focal project of education that people vote in the election legitimately. The participation of teachers in government education allows us to have the ability in the most profound changes Uruguayan education needs, teachers are participles of it. You can not change and make profound changes in public education if the education stakeholders are not committed, are not convinced, are not part of that process of change, "said the deputy.

The Codex will have five members, three are appointed by the Executive and the other two will be elected by teachers, who currently have no representation on the boards of education.

Councils and Primary Education, Basic Media, High School and UTU, will comprise three members. Two of them are appointed by the Codex and the remaining will be elected by teachers.

The Boards of Secondary Education, Higher UTU includes news that is incorporated, also a student representative who is not more than 20 years of age.

The law provides for changes in secondary education.

aim is to design a middle school where high school and are more integrated UTU providing additional knowledge to enable a student to have "flexibility" to move from one level to another.

also seek to delay the decision of teenagers have to choose between high school and the UTU.

One option, as in other countries, according to Canepa said, is that children have more years of school and that the decision between high school and UTU, and in turn, the choice of a career "is passed to more ahead. "

"It will be the design of secondary education in Uruguay, with an average basic and upper basic half means we can break that pattern of separation that exists in Uruguay, where at a certain age, very young, is makes a fictitious separation between manual and intellectual, as if the child can not have the option of a dual education, both practically and in his intellect, which later allows him not to make a decision at 14, 15 years on what his vocation, but forward, "said Canepa.

He emphasized that the law promotes a great "mobility" between different orientations, so that the student will not have to start over to change direction.

"We have to understand what the new institutions created is a much more flexible, with a more horizontal, with the possibility of moving from one place to another more easily, and not to the watertight compartments which we find ourselves they do that often, after certain options, be very difficult to go back, because when you want at one point that he really wants to move to another garden of the teaching is very complex and will make you start all the way back . This is a recording problem in Uruguay, the redesign should help to generate institutional education more flexible and adaptable to the interests that exist today. "

There are also changes at the primary level. Education reform aims to extend the school day to five hours a day-today are four-and early education is compulsory from age 3.

"We have to understand what the new institutions created is a much more flexible, with a more horizontal, with the possibility of moving from one place to another more easily, and not to the watertight compartments which we find ourselves they do that often, after certain options, be very difficult to go back, because when you want at one point that he really wants to move to another garden of the teaching is very complex and will make you start all the way back. This is a serious problem in Uruguay, the institutional redesign should help create a more flexible education and according to the interests that exist today, "explained the legislature.

Another innovation is the creation of an autonomous, independent and Anep UDELAR, which is responsible for the training of teachers and raise the discipline at university level.

also create a Higher Technical Institute, which shall consist of polytechnics across the country that will university status to various technical programs that now the state dictates.

other hand, will create a National Evaluation Institute, a legal person of public law, not state, which shall consist of a thin, Ministry of Education, three of the ANEP and two from the University of the Republic a private education.

Its mission will be to assess, externally, the quality of education through specific studies and research lines.

On Monday, the Education Law will be analyzed by the Political Bureau, and then get endorsement of the party organ, will begin to be debated in Parliament.
Canepa said
opens dialogue with the National Party and the Colorado Party. He acknowledged that while there will be differences, the Education Act may gather important matches and applied effectively.

However, the law is rejected by the education unions who threaten strikes and demand greater participation in the organs.

The Executive Board of the Guild of secondary school teachers (Fenapo) is meeting at this time analyzing the text of the law that ended up closing the FA.

leader José Olivera confirmed this morning at 810 Index that next Monday will hold a 24-hour strike in support of his colleagues in the Liceo 62, but also against the government's Education Act.

that day return to set up a tent outside the Legislative Palace, where in a few days will begin to debate the law.

Olivera explained that the teachers question the law has been prepared by the government and not by teachers, which in turn is desoiga as resolved by the Education Congress.

"This draft agreement reached by the Frente Amplio broadly maintaining the essence of the original project emanated from the Council of Ministers. Second, in the outcome document of the committee are large errors in what he has to do with the legislative technique, with the drafting of the project, confusion misquoted articles, a number of themes rather desporolijo this document to analyze it seriously. Third, what is most worrying is that all this time, obviously the political force dedicated to agree within the political force but not to create spaces with some partners such as unions or the student movement, or the assemblies technical teachers, to achieve some agreement on the essential contents of this bill, "said Olivera.

Source: El Espectador.

Clavicle Brace Posture

Planet Earth Forever

This video is totally aligned with our challenge for this week wonder.

Please watch it, marvel and publish your comments

Greetings and happy day! Olivia

For Sale Scamp Travel Trailers In Calgary

YOU CAN HEAL YOUR LIFE The Movie Part 1

As the fragments have disappeared from the movie the secret, I will put other videos very interesting to ponder:)
hope will be useful, are my Deliberate Creation favorite authors.

Intel Extreme Graphic 2 Dual Monitor

Registration:

Montevideo, October 13, 2008

ratings in recent weeks made by President Dr. Tabaré Vázquez on tuition fees and conditions of admission to the University of the Republic has shown the existing positions in the same intention to generalize about their tertiary education in our country.

We understand from the Federation of University Students of Uruguay that should make every effort to ensure that more young people enter college, the college students want more college students. Then consider education as an inalienable human right.

In this sense we work to deepen the path of a Unified National Scholarship.

We are against any action, such as tuition fees, to deepen existing inequalities in society and undermines the principles of equality and free.

Adding further that the University of the Republic a role not competent solicitor or redistribution of wealth, but must also strive to ensure widespread knowledge.

ASCEEP - FEUU

Kanchipuram Silk Sarees In Toronto

FEUU Statement Should be paid by tertiary education and university?

Statements by the President of the Republic have once again to the fore the question of title. In the discussion of the legal framework of public education, Uruguay deserves a calm and thorough debate on the subject. Political parties, in particular, should decide regard. What follows is a modest and succinct contribution to the exchange of ideas.

Education benefits who accesses it and the whole society. The level of material and spiritual life of a community depends greatly on the level of education of its members. Therefore, education for all must be paid for by society as a whole. Who have had the privilege of completing an advanced training paid by the entire society-something that today not many people can do in our country, we have a moral duty to contribute especially to finance public education, in proportion to the revenue that our training we can get. This approach to the problem funding of tertiary education and university is both fairer and more efficient than the tuition fees to those who are supposed to be able to pay.

Who would be charged fees? In the case of the University of the Republic, 76% of their students need to work, 55% are employed and 21% are unemployed. In addition, one in three students at our institution works thirty hours a week. So do not make sense to charge tuition at least three-quarters of the students. As for the remaining 24%, how many of them could afford it? How many require additional support from their families? In many cases, families have made and continue making a significant effort for their children to study. Can they expand their contribution?

What we should ride inspection tool to find out what students can afford, what does not and how does the situation of each? How many problems would be generated as well? How much money would be raised this way? How many students abandon their studies? The enrollment decline access to tertiary education, with negative consequences not only for those who remain outside it but for the future of the country.

The contribution of professional through the Solidarity Fund to this fund allows thousands of scholarships. If this contribution is proportional to income, be more fair and increase the resources available.

In this way you can move towards what should be a great national goal for any country that aspires to full development: widespread access to advanced training, quality, connected with the work over a lifetime. Otherwise not have made the nations that are often cited as success stories of recent rapid improvement in quality of life for its people. More than seven in ten young people in South Korea or Finland, Ireland and New Zealand, access to higher education; in Uruguay, the figure drops to less than half.

It is conceivable that the position defended here is consistent with the view of the national government. This emerges from the text of the Draft General Law of Education that the Executive has presented to Parliament. Article 19 provides: "The principle of free will ensure compliance with the right to education and the universalization of access and retention of people in the education system." Article 25 makes clear that the project refers to all education levels, from beginners to university, including graduate students.

This is fully consistent with the Constitution, article 71 reads: "Declare social utility of free formal education primary, secondary, tertiary, industrial and artistic and physical education." The big question is if we aim to reduce or expand free public education. Let us hope that an open discussion lead to clear statements and provided with broad support.

Source: Rector's Report No. 49

Best 11 X 17 Professional Scanner

"Ipa? Towards an autonomous body for teacher training.

agency will propose building to train educators .

"The base of the Frente Amplio opposition pose the creation of an autonomous body for the purpose of training teachers, teachers and all kinds of teachers, from preschool to university.
The proposal would be included in the proposed new Education Act.
As reported in The Observer, the ruling party claims that the institute has a university, independent, co-governed. This means that, if approved, will be fully independent and UDELAR ANEP. The The new center would be in the hands of teachers, alumni and students without the participation of political power. "
(Source: El Espectador).

Del document submitted to the CNE by the Directorate of Training and Teaching:

"... the group of institutional actors of the Directorate of Training and Teaching: Management Team, Directors of Institutes and Centers, Teachers and in order to incorporate this issue to Congress on Education to be held soon, exposes the following ideas CODE:

1. is requested concerned explicitly the possibility that the Department of Teacher Education and Teacher Training was established as an autonomous ...

All of the above would constitute a complex of high profile education, as the country needs to strengthen its education system and therefore the integral training of citizens and continuing training of its teachers. "

How To Add Cheats To Itouch For Pokemon

Simon says ... SPICED

First of all we thank all colleagues who have left comments and have helped make this blog a space for discussion and exchange to the Education Act that deserve ... Comment on the other hand, that add a presentation that can enlighten us about the content of the project. can access through the sidebar or by click here . And we continue sharing
items ...

The Education Minister, Maria Simon spoke on national television last night and referred to the Education Bill that the executive sent to parliament on this blog and try to discuss tools and feedback we have left behind. Then transcribe the words of the minister:

Goodnight Uruguayans of all ages. I am writing to explain that we needed on the development of education in general and the Education Bill that the executive branch submitted to Parliament.

understand that this communication is our duty, because education in the interest of all citizens and is a hot topic: to discuss and analyze must be informed. Try to refer to the core aspects of education in general and of the proposal.

Education is our commitment to the future, is a core value of national identity and an essential element of culture, progress and social justice. Education is a human right and a public good, ie non-tradable object

In these three years, the government developed policies to promote equity, social justice and improving the lives of all citizens, especially of the poorest. The Plan of Attention to Social Emergency Plan Equity, Health Reform and Tax Reform, are the most important. It must be stressed Ceibal Plan , experience unique in the world to come up with one laptop per child, which as it relates to education and social cohesion. Just tomorrow the President will deliver the 100,000 th computer.

Our present education is very good and very good, but much to improve, to adapt to major changes that have occurred in the world especially in regard to knowledge.

Education Reform will require the participation of all.

who do I mean when I say everyone? I speak to teachers, pupils, students or participants, depending on their age, mothers and fathers, but also quite all citizens interested in education and know that it depends greatly on the country's future. What

proposed this reform?

proposes an integrated system for all, from birth and for life, providing education understood as a human right and tending to a society that is all it a lifelong learning society.

Why educate? Why educate future? What we expect from education? Basically, what we expect for our children or in general for young people: they are good people - caring, respectful of others - to become independent - financially and criterion, ie to defend themselves - and in any as possible to be happy.

What young people want? Basically that education serve them, to prepare them for the future, who feel they have to do with the reality of every day, that motivates and stimulates, the Education Center is a place of coexistence and communication. They want their opinions heard.

We all want that education will generate hope and ability to develop its future in the country.

Another challenge that we consider very fair to the young and not so young is to recognize the knowledge, ie if they change their orientation does not have to start from zero or near zero. Let's take into account their individuality, respecting his personal claim, ie education that suits the learner.

center is taken as values \u200b\u200beducation, which should permeate the whole educational process. For example, health education, including drug prevention, sex education, physical education and recreation, human rights education from the practice - which will then work elements - science education artistic, oral and written communication in your native language or other, environmental education.

for example is not to dictate a few hours on health, but all the action and treatment at the Education Centre was being pursued through health, that be educated from the perspective of prevention, to get healthy and improve the quality of life.

understand essential compatibility between education and work. If this is so, education is free but can only access the highest levels who do not need to work early.

That is why education should provide elements for the job. It is not informally at an early stage but provide elements to function in various tasks.

The biggest challenge ahead is to increase dramatically the number of citizens who arrived without losing quality, increasing. So we must ensure the quality of education. We propose that internal evaluation is complemented with an independent assessment. Besides providing assurance is a form of accountability to society of how resources are used from it.

We care about the coordination of education. I would define coordination in widening circles 3:

First . A coordinated system inside. Our current system has several branches and each one is like a corridor with only one output at the end. The idea is that branch can be changed out and re-enter and to recognize the foreground. Second

. Coordination with culture, science, technology and innovation. We want to be educated, able to create and to appreciate and enjoy the culture, in all its forms, throughout life and innovative individuals with an entrepreneurial spirit, able to take risks and perhaps with less fear of making mistakes. Third

. An education project coordinated with the country. We have to create the formations that the country will need. We must aim not only to develop the right people to a country program, but able to transform it.

to function in an increasingly complex world we propose to increase the number of hours of education and the amount of years of education guaranteed to complete secondary education.

attach great importance to the Education Center, conceived not only as a place where they are taught but as a social and civic center that will deepen and make very strong links between education and society. That is one of the guarantees, along with human rights education, so that these centers are not only more peaceful coexistence but enjoyable, constructive, fun, convener. In this sense, it deepens the allocation of resources to schools and participation councils are created with representation from teachers, pupils or students, parents and citizens general. We received

pose in terms of ensuring the regularity of these meetings and the participation of the various components, especially students, with whom students remember the martyrs on 14 August. We have also received pose about expanding the duties of such boards. All these pose contribute constructively , precisely because the idea is to have the widest possible participation.

This project ensures the tradition of Uruguayan independence of education, understood as independence from partisan politics. Autonomy does not mean

lack of coordination, as has been highlighted ANEP and the University, we all speak of a self-responsible and attentive to society.

We encourage participation and co government at different levels, starting with the Education Center to talk and get to the central bodies with members elected by teachers. It also includes the presence of competent persons proposed by the government to represent all citizens and ensure the coordination of the educational and national project.

also proposed advisory boards of the central organs in which students, staff non-teaching staff, parents or guardians in the case of UTU , workers and employers.

In this case we have also received pose of participation without vote in half a second cycle students, the elderly, is a way to learn to co rule.

is also proposed to create community colleges for the training of specialized technology or even in management, health, tourism, dairy, forestry, machinery or languages.

productive the country indeed needs a lot of these formations that will help combat youth unemployment is one of our main concerns.

In summary approval of a General Education Law is really necessary to order an educational system that has great items but is dispersed. Establish the organization of the system, establish fundamental principles and the importance of the School as a civic center, linking education with work, end the division between those who prepare for intellectual tasks and those preparing for manual work and concern for quality .

I think we all believe that education reform is needed to accompany the changes taking place in the world and anticipate and drive the changes we want in our country. A law is necessary but not sufficient. Only with the participation of all changes take root and grow.

Its purpose is to help develop citizens who are themselves full guarantee of the future of this nation.

Many thanks for your time and good night.

Can I Give My Dog Herpes I By Kissing Him

DISCUSSION. Isabella replied to Carlevaro.

and starts with the controversy ...
few days ago I approached a very controversial article of Dr. Carlevaro, former dean of medicine ... and a few days later, "The Daily", published a timely response from the university teacher Fernando Isabella, transcribe article ...

To see the article by Dr. Carlevaro, please click here .

The government of education V: PERPLEXITIES
on the notes of Dr. Carlevaro

Dr. Carlevaro calls in his various columns on the autonomy of education or the right of involved self-government without external interference. Who are the stakeholders who have the right to govern? "Teachers and students?" Who are these actors "outside" the education system who want to meddle? Do politicians? "All others who are not teachers or students?. An employee who is not a student or teacher, is it an outsider? Does your desire to participate in decisions that make the governance of education is an intrusion? And a housewife? A pensioner, an unemployed, police? "All these are external agents that have nothing to do with education? Is education only involves teachers and students? All we fund the education system, are we outsiders?

Those in the future send their children to the educational system, which will return to it when they want to deepen their training, all those whose fate is tied to the fate of the country, which in turn is tied to the performance of education systems, ie, all Uruguayans, are outsiders? How do we make all these individuals to participate in the decisions of the education system? Are we a million assemblies? Are we a "comisioncita" of participation? Do we include the other unions in the governance of education? "And also to cooperatives and NGOs and entrepreneurs, and the committees of neighbors and the church ....? What is the role of democratically elected governments? Why are elected? When people choose to support a political project is not directly or indirectly supports an educational project? Why is the influence of the government's view that heads the project elected by the people is a "danger", says Dr Carlevaro? Is it that people are not ready to choose country projects? Should some "enlightened" chosen by the people? Is not that what everyone says dictators?

Why are more legitimate trade union representatives teaching order, elected by a portion of the national teachers' representatives elected by all citizens? Is it that they are more able, because they have "technical competence" says Dr Carlevaro? Is it that only "technically competent" to define the important things? Or that your opinion is worth more than all other citizens together? Is that not called technocracy? Would not it be like then say that a figure so important to the welfare of the population such as the finance minister should be elected from among the "technically competent", say economists society? Or that public safety policies should be resolved by the police? What kind of elitist and undemocratic approach can justify this? How do you call, what color would you give this proposed Carlevaro totalitarianism? What's left? Is it revolutionary?

is true, the political upheavals, changes in the ruling parties will translate then swings in education policy. Is it wrong that when the public makes a change in its bid to draft the country's education system to adapt to that? Is it good that the country made a commitment to a development project and the educational system is designed for a different country? Would not it be undemocratic society makes choices, change their views but these changes of opinion of the "sovereign" are not sovereign in education? And the dynamics of the orders and guilds also imply no evolution of thought, confrontation of ideas and projects so much change? Why is it wrong that the education system to adapt to changes in the projects and ideas of citizenship, but not bad to suit the changes of projects and ideas of the unions?

What guilds no power struggles? Are there no charges desires? Disputes are not given places? In recent years alone, there have been tremendous internal strife in the teachers' union? What about the secondary teachers? Does the process of choosing university president did not involve multiple voting, thousands of meetings, countless "kitchens" and why these disputes are bad and "pollute" the trigger when given to the level of governments and political parties, but not when there are so similar, in guilds? There is not "pollute" their decisions? When the university actors agree that the strikes mean no salary deductions for teachers and officials, are making a selfless decision for the good of education? Is not there selfish interests at stake ?

Moreover, Dr Carlevaro, advocates on one hand the importance of participation and contribution of students and on the other hand, when they apparently do not believe what he believes are accused of being "infiltrators" and "deny themselves." Is that respect for the functioning of student organizations? Is not this another case of "fear of freedom" that he accuses the government? Could it be that students are not able to comment and Dr. Carlevaro must enlighten? In any case raise a flag and student participation to argue a position and then deny such participation when the actors do not believe what you want is not called demagoguery? Is not that one of the "dirty things" that Dr . rejects politicians? Fernando

Isabella University Professor

How To Make Your Voice Sweet And Soft

+ Education!

"My vision of literacy goes beyond the ba, be, bi, bo, bu.
Because it involves an understanding critique of social, political and economic inclusion is the literate. "
P. Freire.

Comrades. Uncut tapes or photographers that we have no give and opened it tries to be nothing more than a tool to share our concerns and proposals for national education, our educational institutions and our hopes for the education they need, that it is our card up its sleeve to transform our reality better.

try to go hang all the info that may be emerging debates around education reform, especially the debate now installed on the General Law of Education.

then invite your comments and proposals LEYDEEDUCACION.BLOGSPOT.COM